How to Evolve Security for the Cloud: McKinsey with Google Cloud


Of your peers have already read this article.

8:30 Minutes

The most insightful time you'll spend today!

Delve into McKinsey's eye-opening research that creates a framework using 6 cloud-cybersecurity models and studies the economics of cloud security.

Not too long ago, McKinsey released a report titled “Making a secure transition to the public cloud,” the result of interviews with IT security experts at nearly 100 enterprises around the world.

Leveraging the expertise of Google Cloud and McKinsey security experts, the research presents a strategic framework for IT security in cloud and hybrid environments, and provides recommendations on how to migrate to the cloud while keeping security top of mind.

The research shows what many already know: that public cloud adoption is accelerating thanks to increased technical flexibility, simpler scaling, and lower operating costs.

What’s exciting is that the research also reveals that many Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) no longer view security as an inhibitor to adoption but instead an opportunity.

“In many cases [CISOs] acknowledge that cloud service providers’ security resources dwarf their own,” the authors write—and now these companies are focused on how to best adopt and configure cloud services for increased security.

The research identifies three common archetypes for perimeter security: backhauling, cleansheeting, and adopting cloud provider controls by default.

  • Backhauling allows companies to continue managing IT security on-prem, with an external gateway connecting the data center to the public cloud. Approximately half of the companies surveyed currently use this model, but only 11% plan to continue doing so, since it can keep companies from realizing certain cloud benefits, such as agility.
  • Cleansheeting requires greater investment and expertise, as it calls for redesigning IT security around a “virtual perimeter” and leveraging multiple cloud-native tools and services.
  • Using cloud provider controls is the most cost-effective solution, but—depending on the cloud provider—can limit autonomy and may offer limited capabilities.

McKinsey uses these three models, along with the decision to re-architect applications for the cloud, to identify six “archetypes” for cloud security. Each archetype has its own tradeoffs.

The report also includes a tactical 10-step plan for successful cloud migration. Download it now.

More Relevant Stories for Your Company


Stop Cribbing About Shadow IT and Start Taking Charge Now

Employees use tools at their disposal to get work done, but if these tools (often legacy) hamper collaboration or are inflexible, they’ll turn to less secure options for the sake of convenience. According to Gartner, a third of successful attacks experienced by enterprises will come from Shadow IT usage by 2020. 


MIT Cloud Security Confidence Report: An Evolution Worth Noting

The age of unthinking fears about cloud security is over. Not only is cloud adoption rising steadily across geographies, industries and job functions, but confidence in cloud security is rising as well — to the point where increased security is a major reason enterprises opt for cloud solutions. Gone are


The Many Risks of Ignoring the Impact of a Tighter Cloud Security Framework

The perimeter has disappeared and access to company data is no longer limited to your physical office or your employees. Instead, in today’s transformed workforce - increasingly connected, collaborative and in the cloud - the security perimeter has become dispersed and elastic, wrapped around each user and device. Moreover, ‘users’


How to Detect and Eliminate New Cloud Security Threats: Tips for Your Security Teams

Why do we keep talking about security all the time? Why hasn’t anyone just gone and fixed it? You’ve probably heard these questions, whether from your leadership, or a board member or just from friends. Then you labor at explaining why security in the cloud is so complex and challenging,